When being disputed by more than one club the players used to decide where to go based only in the highest wage, but not anymore. The player decision has been enhanced to also consider first team opportunity, in other words, how good he is compared to his future teammates in the same position.
Example: team A and team B are making offers to an attacker. In team A he would become the 2nd best attacker, in team B he would become the 4th best attacker. If team A and team B offer the same wage, or even if team B’s offer is slightly better, he will go to team A. In order to hire the player team B must make a much better offer.
There is no easy way to tell how much more team B needs to offer in a situation like the one above, only practical situations will tell you that. It really depends on player quality (the higher the quality, higher the wage difference needed) and relative position difference (2nd best vs. 3rd best, 1st best vs. 5th best…the higher this position difference, higher the wage difference needed).
Cheers!
The world cup month should be full of development activity for rubysoccer. Our match engine should be one of the most noticeable improvements – but we are planning many others! Stay tuned.
ps: the biggest surprise of all would be to get some donations to help us maintaining the server…
Couto a rising star!
I know, I really need a better goalkeeper… I’ll try to find another one.
Le To, you should get a better goalkeeper. You have good players but not a good GK.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/830892
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/215
Good players for sale and for loan, players that are still improving.
just look at the players for sale
Giorgio Furlan D, 87 takle, 88 speed, 92 ctr.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/104506
Gilberto Tavares F, 91 pas, 91 sho, 95 spe, 92 dri, 94 crt, 89 hea.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/64775
Ivã Gaspar MD, 21yo 76 tac, 79 pas, 79 sho, 79 spe, 84 dri, 86 ctr, 82 hea
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/118568
Jermaine Harris, D, 84 tac, 95 spe, 94 dri, 86 ctr.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/90906
Valerio Zancos, 84 tac, 90 dri, 94 ctr, 89 hea.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/96025
Take a look for your self!!!!!!!
I´m looking for a great middlefielder. He should have good control, pass, dribble and tackle.
High average skills is welcome.
I can pay a little fortune if he is really a star.
Same thing for me (his goalkeeper)… 15M and rose his price by 3M.
I cancelled.
Couto wants to get the world record. 2nd red card, now after 2 minutes. :) I guess he has choosen the wrong sport. :p
45 min: Couto (a) replaces Hortiguela (a)
47 min: The referee shows Couto (a) a red card.
good for you charles
the guys a fookn dickhead
Prices dropped on my players, most notably:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/110827 for 24m
felipe has no transfer etiquette whatsoever.
i had a deal down for one of his players, and just as the game was about to tick, he rose his price by 1mil$
i’m sorry but i have no patience for people who have no integrity such as him.
as such, i told him to go f*** himself and cancelled my bid :)
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/830782
Nope, the value is a little bit higher than usual but is not a bug. He is a pretty good player, would be a star in Turkey :D
Gouin (Bordeaux – Fastticker) worth $17,147,780? Ok he is good on his headskills for a AD (95 tack, 100 sho) But overall is isn’t that good. For instance Soares and Duchamp are much better overall and are worth 11,5M and 15,6M. Is this a bug?
Small adjustment to match parameters in a tentative to reduce the number of “unfair” results. Let’s keep an eye on the results. I’m sure you guys will keep informing us when any of these happens. Keep in mind that they should still happen, but less frequently.
Solid players but looks like nobody is interested. So take your chance. Prices can be negotiated.
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/team_players/462
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/match_report/813397
Topplayers for sale:
94 defender (28 y.o.): http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/54804
91 defender (26 y.o.): http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/64620
96 attacker (27 y.o.): http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/59561
Make me an offer and we’ll talk. Prices can be adapted.
Ismaël Chauvel D RC 20 - 87 71 63 84 77 81 77 77 23
Available for loan
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/player_info/125584
Thanks Gabriel, now at least I know why. Of course I still can’t explain how given a total shots on target edge of 45 to 11 we end up with an aggregate of 2-2, especially given that I’ve got a better keeper and better strikers than the other team. Also crazy is that the team is playing a 4-1-5 and 5-1-4. Is there anyway to improve the AI to have enough players to at least play something fairly standard? I can’t imagine a team ever going with fewer than 3 mids, much less a single one.
closed
Whole variety of players for sale:
http://www.rubysoccer.com/game/league_transfers/20
23 year old attacker, 91 shooting still improving
32 year old attacker, 100 shooting
29 year old AM with 91-80-87 tackle-pass-shoot
21 year old mid with 89 tackle, 91 pass
And a couple others – make me an offer and we’ll talk.
@EverettB the tiebreaker is most goals scored as visitor. The penalty shootout happens only if the 2 scores are exactly the same.
why should I change a winning formation! until I start loosing a lot then I should try something else but for now this is the formation that goes best with my team! I beat u 0-3 with the same one LOL :P!
A pair of my national cup games:
2 × 2
4-4-2 formation 4-1-5
56% possession 44%
28 shots 11
25 shots on target 9
89% accurrate passes 84%
62% effective tackles 41%
5 corners 0
5 offsides 4
2 fouls 7
0 × 0
5-1-4 formation 4-4-2
42% possession 58%
3 shots 26
2 shots on target 20
88% accurrate passes 91%
32% effective tackles 56%
2 corners 7
5 offsides 6
6 fouls 3
Also, can someone explain to me the tiebreaker for a completely tied cup set? Last year I won one, this year I lost, and I can’t tell in either instance.
93 passing available for loan – CLOSED